It’s Never Too Early For A Succession Plan

Posted July 24, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration

It may seem strange to think about succession on your direct report’s first day but there may be no better time.  In this case, I’m talking about the part of succession that makes certain you have the critical aspects of your direct report’s job functions documented sufficiently enough for someone else to be able to know HOW to do that aspect of the job.

From the first day your new hire, as a matter of survival, will be carefully documenting how to perform their job duties for their own use so that steps are not missed and repetitive questions can be avoided.  After your direct report has successfully completed these functions based on their own notes, simply take those notes and formalize them into a succession plan for the job.

This documentation can then be used for cross-training and development purposes of co-workers who may be groomed for performing those very tasks at a later date.  You also communicate to the new direct report, that you anticipate their continued growth in the organization; preparing for someone at a later date to perform those tasks will allow for time and opportunity to learn new tasks of their own.

If you wait until someone is well ensconced in a role, the detail with which they document tasks may not be of sufficient detail to allow others to complete the tasks without personal observation or some trial and error.

Empower your direct reports for their own development by ensuring the documentation of critical tasks which may be done by others in (or outside of) your organization.

Don’t Forget The Email Screen In Your Selection Process

Posted July 19, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

Most hiring managers have some sort of process they follow when filling an open position. Common processes include job definition, phone screens, behavior based interviewing, behavioral assessments, reference checking, and on-boarding.  Adding an email screen to your process is also beneficial.

The email screen should be done after the phone screen but before the first interview.  There are three objectives of the email screen:

  1. insure the candidate is email savvy,
  2. assess the candidate’s writing abilities,
  3. assess the candidate’s ability to follow directions and meet time commitments.

We recommend hiring managers ask candidates to describe in an email how they have demonstrated one or some or the company’s core values in their prior job(s).  This provides additional insight into how well the candidate may fit into your culture.  For example, “Here at ABC Company, one of our core values is ‘find a way to say yes;’ give me an example of a time when you had a difficult customer and you had to find a creative way to say ‘yes’.  Respond to this email as if you were replying to your boss.”

You’ll be amazed at the responses you get.  Email screens provide insight difficult to get from interviews.  Best of all – they are free and require little of your time.

Empower your hiring managers with email screens and your new hires will be even more successful.

Prepare For Interviews

Posted July 11, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

All good processes begin with some pre-planning and never is that more true than in a selection process.  We suggest getting crystal clear about what you’re looking for in advance to prepare for your interviews.

The most important preparation is identifying the critical activities for that job and how they should be done — giving careful consideration to the traits that will increase the likelihood of an individual’s success in that job.  Here’s the key: you’re identifying the key traits for THAT JOB.

Without careful planning, we may fall into the “I’ll know it when I see it” trap looking for traits we generally admire in people even if they may be detrimental or counterintuitive for the job.  For example, selecting a candidate who is outgoing with an ease for chatting up any topic in the interview may make sense for a sales position, but may be indicative of lacking the focus, attention to detail, and thorough consideration for a quality assurance position.

Empower your interviewers by agreeing in advance on the accountabilities and traits critical to the job for which they are interviewing.  As interviewers, the likelihood of them selecting the best candidate for the position increases significantly as does their buy-in and support of the new employee once selected.

The Importance of the Onboarding Process

Posted June 27, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration, Selection

Recruiting does not end when a new employee starts. It is important to cement retention during the first 90 days of employment. Make sure the employee’s desk is prepared for their first day.  Do they have a computer? Are their phones ready? Is their work area ready?  Do you have a plan for their first few days, including lunch?  And most important of all: do they understand their accountabilities?

Meet with your new direct report on their first day, and on a regular basis during the first 90 days to provide and receive feedback and review their accountabilities. Check in with the new direct report at 30, 60, and 90 days to see if their expectations match reality, whether they have all of the resources they need, and to provide mutual feedback.

Have a plan and provide adequate training and resources for your new direct report so that they can be successful. This doesn’t mean just providing them with manuals to read.  Have them shadow people in different areas or have some of your most experienced people share war stories.  If they must read manuals, schedule breaks at various sections of the manual to discuss application of what they read to the work they will be doing.

Consider all of the resources it took to recruit this individual. Isn’t it worth it to cement the relationship now that you have made the hire and empower them for success?

If Your Selection Process Isn’t Working, Tweak It

Posted June 20, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

We’ve all heard the definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.  If you believe the way you’ve hired in the past gives you as much confidence as rolling dice, why wouldn’t you do something different in hopes of increasing your odds?

Many leaders have a process to yield excellent results and prevent weak, or worse, disastrous hires.  It is important to tweak your process from time to time to accommodate various needs.  That may include using a search firm to source candidates who are then run through your process, adding an additional round of interviews, moving assessments up in the process, or doing a much longer phone interview before flying a candidate into town.

The bottom line is, you need an evolving process – not just a particular kind of interview, or use of an assessment.  A process that yields certain results and allows for adjustments when necessary.  Don’t throw out an entire process, but critically look at what seems to be working well and where it could be improved.

Feel free to visit our website to use any part of our process you find useful (here).

Empower your hiring managers to make the right hiring decisions by giving them a process that works.

Cognitive Abilities More Important Now Than Ever

Posted June 13, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration, Selection

We all have varying degrees of steadiness.  Some of us are focused, unyielding, and undeterred by distractions.  Some of us are flexible, multi-tasked, and enjoy distractions.  Some of us are a little of both.

How does the ubiquity of technological distractions today impact our ability to be productive?  How do the super-steady types avoid getting frustrated with all the interruptions.  And how do the easily distracted types garner enough focus to finish anything?

The answer is: we adapt to the situation for short periods of time.  Our ability to adapt is largely a function of our cognitive abilities.  We must continuously adjust our natural style and what feels comfortable to either block out the interruption or respond to it.  Those with strong  cognitive abilities are likely to be most successful in today’s work environment.

Are your direct reports developing their cognitive abilities?  Are you screening new-hire candidates for their thinking?  Empower your direct reports to focus on their critical thinking skills and they will be successful.

Talent Processes Are More Important Now Than Ever

Posted June 4, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration, Selection

“In a poll conducted by human-resources consultant Right Management at the end of 2009, 60% of workers said they intended to leave their jobs when the market got better.” – Wall Street Journal, May 25th 2010
What are you doing to retain your superstars?  What talent processes are you using to insure you don’t lose 60% of your team? Based on The 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave by Leigh Branham, employees leave because:
  1. Job not as expected
  2. Job doesn’t fit talents and interests
  3. Little or no feedback/coaching
  4. No hope for career growth
  5. Feel devalued and unrecognized
  6. Feel overworked and stressed out
  7. Lack of trust or confidence in leaders
Talent process improve your chances to retain your superstars as valuable contributors to your organization.  A comprehensive selection process addresses job expectations (#1), job fit (#2), and organization fit (#4).  A robust performance process addresses feedback (#3), recognition (#5), workload (#6) and trust (#7).
As the economy improves, expect your superstars to have many opportunities to leave.  Implementing effective selection and performance processes (like SelectAdvantage and PerformanceAdvantage) now will empower your leaders to successfully hold on to your superstars.

Start In The First Person When Delivering Course Corrections

Posted May 24, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership

Many of us still feel uncomfortable when giving course corrections. The last thing we want to do is de-motivate an direct report, or hurt the feelings of an direct report when something “is just not that big a deal” but should still be addressed.  The fact is: if we didn’t care about the direct report’s success or believe they made valuable contributions to the organization, we wouldn’t bother giving them feedback.

When giving feedback, starting in the first person prevents the direct report from being thrown on the defensive right from the first phrase.  If you begin in the second person, it can sound harsh and put the direct report in a defensive posture.

After starting in the first person, the direct report should get the distinct impression you have every confidence they have the ability to correct their course, be successful, and fix a situation on their own which creates an empowered, non-defensive response.

Remember, if it’s a direct report you believe is a successful contributor to your organization, empower them to correct their course by starting your message in the first person.

Seek Stakeholder Input When Defining A Job

Posted May 15, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

Whether you are defining jobs using a traditional job description or an Accountability Matrix (our recommendation), you’ll want to get input from people who interact with the individual in the job when outlining the key requirements.

The supervisor and/or HR are generally responsible for defining the requirements for a job.  Soliciting input from those closest to the job provides two important advantages.  The people working closely with the job know whether it’s being done correctly or not — often because it impacts their work.  Gaining input from these stakeholders helps further define the success factors of the job.  Additionally, consulting the stakeholders creates a commitment from them to the individual in the job to succeed since they had a hand in defining it.  Just imagine the support felt by a new hire!

Ask for input from many people when defining your jobs and your direct reports will succeed.

Tip: Tie Selection to Performance

Posted May 10, 2010 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

After you invested in developing Job Accountabilities and a Job Profile at the beginning of your selection process, you’ve noted the ease with which the decision of who to hire, and not to hire, has been.  Too often, we notice some leaders failing to get the real “bang for their buck” because that appears to be the end of the point at which the Job Accountabilities and Job Profile are used.

During your one-on-ones and quarterly performance reviews, be certain to go over the accountabilities and success factors by asking whether or not your direct report is on track or off track.  If off-track, ask the employee if they need additional resources or obstacles removed to get themselves back on track.  Also ask by what date should you expect to see them on track.

Additionally, the Job Profile can provide a path to reinforcing the right means by which to achieve those results.  So ask about the behaviors, motivators, and skills you defined as critical to the job at least as part of your quarterly reviews.  As an example:  please describe for me a time you demonstrated Goal Achievement or Personal Accountability in the last quarter.  The other option is to use the behavior based interview questions used with candidates to probe the right characteristics with employees.

Remember if the Job Accountabilities define WHAT we want done in a job, and the Job Profile defines HOW we want the job performed, a real superstar will accomplish both.  Use what you already have in place to drive the performance excellence you seek.