Archive for the ‘Selection’ category

Tip: Tie Selection to Performance

May 10, 2010

After you invested in developing Job Accountabilities and a Job Profile at the beginning of your selection process, you’ve noted the ease with which the decision of who to hire, and not to hire, has been.  Too often, we notice some leaders failing to get the real “bang for their buck” because that appears to be the end of the point at which the Job Accountabilities and Job Profile are used.

During your one-on-ones and quarterly performance reviews, be certain to go over the accountabilities and success factors by asking whether or not your direct report is on track or off track.  If off-track, ask the employee if they need additional resources or obstacles removed to get themselves back on track.  Also ask by what date should you expect to see them on track.

Additionally, the Job Profile can provide a path to reinforcing the right means by which to achieve those results.  So ask about the behaviors, motivators, and skills you defined as critical to the job at least as part of your quarterly reviews.  As an example:  please describe for me a time you demonstrated Goal Achievement or Personal Accountability in the last quarter.  The other option is to use the behavior based interview questions used with candidates to probe the right characteristics with employees.

Remember if the Job Accountabilities define WHAT we want done in a job, and the Job Profile defines HOW we want the job performed, a real superstar will accomplish both.  Use what you already have in place to drive the performance excellence you seek.

Strong Critical Thinking Skills Create More Behavior Flexibility

May 3, 2010

We all have natural behavior styles.  This hard wiring is the result of our personal DNA.  Ideally we perform best when we are matched with a job that requires us to use our natural skill set.

Though leaders should strive to fit jobs and direct report’s skill sets, rarely is there a perfect match for a person and a job.  We are all required to adapt our natural skills to those required in the job we are performing.  Those people with a more developed critical thinking or problem solving aptitude are better able to adapt to their natural skills for short periods of time to accomplish the job at hand.

When evaluating talent or considering job fit, pay particular attention critical thinking skills and aptitude.  An increased critical thinking ability provides much more job flexibility and likelihood for success  especially when the tasks within one job set are quite diverse.

Assess Candidates For All Positions

April 25, 2010

Many hiring managers choose to not administer pre-employement assessments for lower paying jobs – this may be a mistake.  Hiring managers rely on assessments to help them uncover candidate strengths and weaknesses that are not easily recognized in an interview but need to be explored in reference checks and subsequent interviews.  These are the same strengths and weaknesses that can give you a competitive advantage or future headaches.  Wouldn’t you want to know that before making the hire?

Managers sometimes skip investing in an assessment because the investment doesn’t seem to make sense for a lower paying position. When faced with this decision, consider your answers to the following questions:

  • How much impact does this person’s performance make on our organization?  If s/he makes a mistake, how much could it cost me?  If s/he is an awesome addition, how does that impact our profit?  Will this person be in a support role to one of my superstars — what impact could that have on the superstar as well as the work itself?
  • Will this person interact with our customers directly?
  • If s/he is a poor hire, who will need to put in extra time/effort to correct or complete the work?  How much more will that cost me?
  • If performance isn’t as expected, how much additional time will I personally need to spend in coaching through performance issues, and what’s my time worth?

If after asking yourself these questions you still feel comfortable skipping an assessment for a non-key role, consider not doing an assessment but also consider outsourcing the work if it is that insignificant to your organization.

Stay In Touch With Your Future New-Hire After Your Offer Has Been Accepted

April 16, 2010

You just finished following your selection process and you are ready to make an offer to a superstar.  The superstar accepts your offer and commits to starting in two weeks.  Now what do you do?

If you found a superstar, someone else is about to loose one.  Expect the superstar’s current employer to try to keep them from leaving by offering increased pay, more responsibility, or a promotion.  You are at a disadvantage here as the superstar has some allegiance and may have second thoughts.  All your hard work and expense following your selection process may be for naught if the superstar decides to rescind their acceptance.

After your offer is accepted, stay in touch with the future new-hire.  Coach the superstar on how to handle their company’s offer to stay.  Ask them, “What is your current boss likely to offer you to get you to stay?  What are you going to do if you are offered more money to stay?  What are you going to tell your boss if s/he offers you a promotion?”  Give them tips on how to answer.  Simply planting these seeds, will help your chances of not loosing your superstar.  Additionally, regular emails and calls are essential to letting the superstar know you really want them.  Meeting for lunch before s/he starts working for you is a good idea.  Your superstar will be excited after deciding to come work for you; keep that excitement from wearing off and avoid the risk of loosing them.

Empower you future new-hires for success and your career will soar.

The Best Time To Assess Candidates In The Selection Process

April 5, 2010

We recommend assessing candidates after the phone screen, core values assignment and first interview.  As assessments become easier to administer, we are seeing more-and-more organizations assessing candidates at various points in their selection process.  In some cases, where they are being inserted, and how they are being used might create a legal/moral dilemma.

Legally, no assessment should count for more than 1/3 of the selection process and no assessment should be a go/no-go decision on its own.

There are two other business reasons not to assess too early in the process: 1) you might be investing in an assessment for a candidate you don’t like and could have screened out without the investment; and 2) the assessment might bias your view of the candidate before you meet. Meeting with a candidate before assessing allows you to be open mined about their styles.

A bigger mistake hiring managers make is administering assessments too late in the process.  It is common for managers to assess candidates as the final step “just in case something pops up.”  By the time a candidate gets to this stage of the process, hiring managers have emotionally committed to the candidate and cannot objectively interpret the results.  If hiring managers are deep into the process and committed to a candidate, don’t bother assessing.

Assessing candidates after the first interview allows the hiring manager to confirm their observations and objectively focus on concerns in follow-up behavior-based interviews and behavior-based reference checks.

Do You Have An Effective Selection Process?

March 27, 2010

We recommend every hiring manager have a repeatable selection process consisting of three phases: job and candidate definition, screening, and evaluation.  How do you know if your selection process is any good?  If you can answer yes to these questions, you probably have an excellent selection process:

  • Do your employees respect the new hire for succeeding in your selection process?
  • Would your employees cringe if they had to go through your selection process?
  • Do weak candidates drop out of your selection process because it is too hard?
  • Are superstars attracted to your company because your selection process ensures weak candidates are not hired?
  • Every new hire, without exception, goes through your selection process?
  • A potential superstar has not dropped out of your selection process because you moved too slowly?

Develop a quality selection process, be disciplined in administering it, and empower your team for success.

Selection Processes Reduce Chances Of Poor Hires

March 21, 2010

Select (verb) – To choose in preference to another or others; pick out (Random House Dictionary).
Process (noun) – A series of actions, changes, or functions bringing about a result (Random House Dictionary).

Does your selection process consist of a series of actions to bring about an ideal choice of candidates?  Many leaders rely on intuition, gut instinct, or some haphazard interview approach when choosing among candidates.  We recommend hiring managers use a defined, repeatable process for selecting talent.

Your selection process should include three phases:

  • job and ideal candidate definition;
  • screening;
  • evaluation.

Define the job and ideal candidate in the definition phase clarifying what is expected of the job and what the ideal candidate will look like.  The screening phase should include consistent behavior-based questioning and assessments that tie back to the job and candidate definitions.  The evaluation phase should analyze gaps and discrepancies between observed candidate behavior and job and candidate requirements.

Define the steps in your selection process, stick to them, and you will empower those in the selection process for success.

Recruit Your Own Talent

February 27, 2010

It wasn’t long ago that most leaders had assistance booking their travel, typing their memos, and printing and coping their reports.  Now, with today’s technology, most leaders book their own travel on-line, use their PC to type their own memos, and have high-speed laser printers for printing their reports.  It’s time for leaders to use technology to do their own recruiting as well.

Today, just like in the days of having assistance typing memos, most leaders seek assistance recruiting their next hire – typically from HR.  These HR experts, while well intentioned, are working with some handicaps.  They typically don’t know exactly where the industry or profession-specific experts are to be found and if they find the superstars they typically aren’t given access because they lack the credentials to “enter the fold.”  If they do get access to an industry or professional group (on-line or in-person), the passive candidate superstar wants to talk to the industry expert to understand what might be alluring about the work being done in the department with the vacancy, not the HR person.  College athletic coaches understand this the best.  When they recruit superstars, they personally contact the recruit’s school, meet with the recruit, and pitch them and their family on joining their team.  College coaches do not rely on someone from the admissions office to recruit their talent.  You shouldn’t either.

There are many easy to use technological resources for leaders to recruit their own talent.  Aside from the common job boards, Craigslist, industry sites, and LinkedIn are often free, effective for reaching the passive job-seeking superstars, and easy to use.  HR Advantage will be hosting a webinar March 4th at 2:00 EST to demonstrate how to use LinkedIn to source and recruit superstars.  A follow-up session will be held on March 25th at 2:00 EST for a hands-on, step-by-step workshop where, live, we’ll walk an entrepreneur through establishing a presence/profile and help him begin trolling for talent right then and there.  Reply to this email to reserve a spot for the webinar or click here for more information.

Empower yourself with the tools to recruit your own talent and you’ll be even more successful.

Use Multiple Assessment Instruments When Evaluating Candidates

February 24, 2010

Most economists expect there to be much more hiring in 2010 – we certainly have seen an increase with our clients.  Assessment instruments have become more common for hiring managers evaluating new hire candidates.  We recommend hiring managers use multiple assessments to evaluate more than one dimension of a candidate’s skill set.

Whether you are using assessments focusing on behavioral styles (Myesr-Briggs, DISC), personal skills (Hartman Value Profile, DNA), or critical thinking (Watson-Glaser, Ravens) it is important to evaluate more than one aspect of a candidate’s work skill set.  We all have multiple sets of skills and rely on different skill sets for different aspects of our job.

Hiring managers should try to assess as many of these skill sets as possible and not rely on just one assessment type.  Hiring managers also should be cautious that no assessment should be the go/no go factor of the selection process, rather indicators of where to probe more fully in interviews and reference checks.

Empower your hiring managers with multiple assessment tools in evaluating their new hires and you’ll experience better hires and less turnover.

Be Clear About Your Needs Before You Begin Your Search

February 24, 2010

“I’ll know it when I see it” may work when you are looking at a restaurant menu, but rarely when you are looking to add exceptional talent to your team.

If you know your organizational needs, you can create what we refer to as an Accountability Matrix for the position.  This includes the 3-5 primary accountabilities, their relative priority, the percent of time expected to be associated with each accountability and the success factors which will determine up front, whether or not someone has been successful or not in the described position.

This planning allows you to focus your interviews on the key components of the job.  In the absences of this planning, you may be attracted to the person most likeable or the best “salesperson” interviewing for the position – which may be fine if you seek a salesperson but it may lead you down the very wrong path if those traits are detrimental to the position.

Empower your new hire for success by creating clarity around the position and a plan to select the individual most successful in that role.