Use Stories To Define Your Culture

Posted January 23, 2015 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Selection

Tags: ,

When we ask executives if their organization has core values that define their culture, most proudly answer yes and either produce a laminated card they keep with them, or describe how they are prominently posted in their building.  We next ask the executive to tell us about their culture or core values and most will stumble, but passionately direct us to their card or wall so we can read all about them.

Every organization has it’s own culture whether it’s intended or not.  Smart executives define the culture they want, share it, live it, and hire for it.  One of the best ways to define and impart culture is to tell stories that reflect what an organization is all about.

Thomas Watson, the founder of IBM, wanted to create a culture that embraced failure and making mistakes.  IBM executives love to tell the story of a 1940’s employee who made a mistake that cost the company $1 million. Knowing that he was about to be fired, the employee typed up his letter of resignation, and handed it to Watson. Watson responded: “Fire you? I’ve just invested $1 million in your education, and you think I’m going to fire you?”

Stories are a powerful way to communicate how things get done.  Encourage your team to share stories that reflect the culture you want, and you’ll empower success.

Kill Two Birds With One Stone Doing MBWA

Posted January 18, 2015 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Communication, Leadership

It’s the beginning of the year and if you are like most people, you’ve committed to getting more exercise.  As a professional, one of your new year’s goals is likely to become a better leader.  Why not work on both goals at the same time?

MBWA is a common acronym which stands for Management By Walking Around, invented by Hewlett-Packard sometime in the 1970s, made famous by Tom Peters and Robert Waterman as one of the ‘Eight Basics’ in their book In Search of Excellence in 1982.  BusinessDictionary.com defines MBWA as:

Unstructured approach to hands-on, direct participation by the managers in the work-related affairs of their subordinates.  In MBWA practice, managers spend a significant amount of their time making informal visits to work areas and listening to the employees. The purpose of this exercise is to collect qualitative information, listen to suggestions and complaints, and keep a finger on the pulse of the organization.

The more a leader walks around, not only are they getting better connected with their organization, they are getting more exercise.  Doug Conant, former President and CEO of the Campbell Soup Company, went so far as to track his MBWA steps “by strapping on a pedometer and trying to walk 10,000 steps every day around our headquarters between meetings to check in with our people.”

Empower yourself to do more MBWA and you’ll be a successful and healthy leader.

In The Long Run Soft Skills Always Trump Hard Skills

Posted January 9, 2015 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Selection

Two IT managers need to make a hire.  Both are looking for a developer with three to five years experience coding in the current hot programming language.

One manager focuses on hard skills – he wants someone with this difficult to find skill who will be productive as soon as they are hired.  The manager hires a search firm and after six months finds the “ideal” person but needs to pay $100,000 and a $30,000 search fee.  The new hire, though technically sound is an okay culture fit and contributes shortly after being hired. Two years later, the difficult to find, “ideal” hire leaves the organization relieving the manager of a departmental headache.   That’s okay because the once coveted skill set is now obsolete.

The other manager within one month hires a person from a LinkedIn ad with little experience but who’s smart, energetic, and a great culture fit.  He pays the new hire $65,000 and trains them for six months.  Seven months after being hired, the same timeframe as the other manager, the employee is contributing.  Two years later this hire is a key member of the team and a superstar programmer adapting to new technologies and continuously honing their skills.

From the time they started their search, it took both managers seven months for their new hire to be productive.  Yet the manager focusing on the soft skills paid much less, found a better match, and still has a high-potential working for them.  Unfortunately, most hiring managers fall into the trap of hiring for hard skills.

Empower your hiring managers to hire for soft skills and you will be more successful in the long run.

Use A Quality Assessment Tool When Screening Candidates

Posted January 4, 2015 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Selection

Here are a few questions from an assessment a hiring manager used to evaluate a candidate:

     What is your favorite color? red / blue / green / black / yellow

     What pet are you most like? dog / cat / reptile / fish / rock

     What tree best describes you? maple / magnolia / pine / oak / citrus

Apparently the results of this questionnaire are supposed to describe one’s personality and help managers determine whether or not someone is a good fit for an organization.  Sadly, some hiring managers use this tool and, more concerning, some actually act on the results.

Assessment tools are becoming more and more common in the hiring process.  Unfortunately, poorly designed and misleading assessments also are becoming more common.  When evaluating assessment instruments consider the following:

  • Time to complete – don’t let a too lengthly questionnaire discourage candidates; very short questionnaires often are not comprehensive enough
  • Multi-dimensional – a good assessment should evaluate multiple aspects of human behaviors (personality, motivations, skill sets)
  • Reliable and valid – the assessment must measure what it is intended to evaluate with reasonable accuracy
  • Tied to job requirements – the assessment should measure characteristics required for a job
  • Expert interpretation – a good assessment requires certified interpretation
  • Invest $300 to $2,500 – the investment for quality assessments and interpretations varies but the adage “you get what you pay for” certainly applies

Empower your hiring managers with quality assessments and they will make more successful hires.

Consider The Two Pizza Rule When Putting Teams Together

Posted December 22, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Communication, Performance Acceleration

Tags: , ,

The two pizza rule states that the number of people working together should not exceed the number of people that can be fed by two pizzas.  The rule was popularized by Jeff Bezos at Amazon who believes two pizza teams create a decentralized and innovative workplace.

The idea behind two pizza teams is that the fewer the people working together, the more effective the communication becomes.  The number of communication links in a two person team is 1, a five person team 10, a ten person team 45, and a 20 person team has a whopping 190 communication links.  The U.S. Navy Seals have learned that four is the optimal size for a combat team.  Larger teams need more communication whereas smaller teams can have better communication.

When assembling a high-function team, a leader my be tempted to include team members from several areas just to make sure everyone is represented. That rarely works – look no further than our government to see what happens with large teams.  Ideally leaders should choose at most six or seven non-ravenous people if they want a highly functional team.

Empower team leaders to build teams using the two pizza rule and you’ll have more successful teams.

It’s Not Too Early To Start Sourcing Candidates

Posted December 12, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Selection

According to us.gov the top five New Year’s Resolutions are:

  1. Lose weight
  2. Volunteer to help others
  3. Quit smoking
  4. Learn more
  5. Get a better job

With sixty-percent of hiring managers expecting an uptick in hiring in the year ahead, now is the best time to start your recruiting efforts — especially since it’s one of the top 5 New Year’s Resolutions for potential applicants!  January is the best month to reach passive candidates capitalizing on their New Year’s resolutions.  Often, these newly resigned job seekers will begin searching for new positions that first week in January even before they have their resumes prepared.

Whether or not you have an immediate need, identifying superstars when they are emotionally committed to change jobs and courting them until you have a spot for them is a strategy that will give you a long-term competitive edge.  We’ve all learned the hard way that waiting until you have an opening is too late to begin searching for just the right person.  Granted, there is some effort required to keep the candidate engaged as the year progresses, but that’s nothing like the effort required to find someone out of thin air once an opening occurs.

As the holidays are upon us, so are lots of gatherings with people looking for safe topics of conversation.  Use the time wisely by preparing a little pitch you or your direct reports can use to describe the culture of your organization and the pros of working there.  When people begin to search for positions, they’ll start by thinking about the type of place they’d like to work — let one of those places that come to mind be yours.

Empower your direct reports to plant seeds of candidate sourcing now, so they can reap the benefits when you need to actively hire but don’t want to settle for any warm body.

How Much Do You Invest In Your Employees?

Posted December 8, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration

President: “We need to invest more in developing our employees.”

Controller: “We can’t invest in them, what if they leave?”

President: “What if we don’t invest in them and they stay?”

The largest expense line item on most company’s income statement is their payroll.  Studies and corporate bottom lines show that companies reap many benefits from investing in training for employees.  Why is it then that leaders are reluctant to invest in developing their talent?

Based on the training investments of 575 companies during a three-year period, researchers found that firms investing the most in training and development (measured by total investment per employee and percentage of total gross payroll) yielded a 36.9 percent total shareholder return as compared with a 25.5 percent weighted return for the S&P 500 index for the same period. That’s a return 45 percent higher than the market average. These same firms also enjoyed higher profit margins, higher income per employee, and higher price-to-book ratios.

Firms that invest $1,500 per employee in training compared with those that spend $125 experience an average of 24 percent higher gross profit margins and 218 percent higher revenue per employee (source: Laurie J. Bassi et al., “Profiting From Learning: Do Firms’ Investments in Education and Training Pay Off?” American Society for Training and Development, 2000).

For example, The Cheesecake Factory, one of the most successful restaurant chains in the nation, spends about $2,000 per employee for training each year and reaps sales of $1,000 per square foot—more than twice the industry average.

Empower your team to invest in talent development and you’ll experience more success than your competition.

Don’t Let Existing Performance Forms Hinder Quarterly Performance Reviews

Posted December 1, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Performance Acceleration

Your organization may have adopted a formal performance review form that feels cumbersome or lengthy discouraging your willingness to conduct quarterly performance reviews.  Here’s a potential compromise. You can still use the short form we’ve been recommending in which you ask the following questions:

  • What have you done last quarter?
  • What will you accomplish next quarter?
  • What have you done to invest in your own personal development?
  • How have you demonstrated our core values?

Just use this format in the quarters for which there is not a corporate mandated form. If your organization insists on a particular form to be used annually or semi-annually, use it; it may not be worth fighting.  Simply use the shorter form on the other quarters and allow that information to populate the corporate form.

Empower your direct reports by giving them more regular check-points to assure alignment to goals and activities through quarterly reviews.

Take A Bullet For Your Direct Reports

Posted November 21, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Leadership, Performance Acceleration

If you’re a baseball fan, you’ve probably seen times when a player begins to argue with an umpire and is about to be ejected from the game.  Suddenly their manager leaps out of the dugout and interrupts the argument, engaging the umpire while deflecting attention from their player.  The manager kicks dirt, throws objects, and screams inches from the umpire all in an attempt to rescue the player.  After the game, when tempers are back to normal and in the privacy of the clubhouse, the manager will offer feedback to the player, coaching them on what to do when experiencing similar situations in the future.

Empowering leaders challenge their direct reports by putting them in difficult situations.  Inevitably, direct reports will struggle as they learn from the experiences.  Good leaders know when to jump in and use their influence to prevent their direct report from embarrassing themselves.  After the incident, in calmer circumstances, the leader provides course correction coaching and helps the direct report grow from the situation.

Not only will the leader benefit from their direct report’s development, the direct report will move mountains for the leader in the future.

Empower your direct reports to pursue challenging tasks, jump in and save them when necessary, and you’ll experience more success.

How Much Effort Do You Spend Before Making A Hire?

Posted November 14, 2014 by The Metiss Group
Categories: Selection

Imagine your organization needs to make a $50,000 capital expenditure (equipment, IT, renovations).  Before making the investment, what actions might your team make?  Would the team gather with an objective expert to discuss the specifications needed?  Would you talk to several suppliers and assess various options?  Would you talk to references from the supplier to determine if they are trustworthy?  Would you make further purchases (insurance, warranties, training) after delivery to protect and maximize the investment?

Most leaders would answer “of course, $50,000 is a lot of money and we don’t want to make a mistake.”  Why is it then that hiring managers don’t put forth as much effort when making a $50,000 hire?

Before making a hire, leaders should gather the job’s stakeholders to determine what is needed from the role and the type of person who fits best.  Hiring managers should interview and assess several candidates.  Hiring managers should talk to candidate references to make sure they are the right fit.  Hiring managers should also invest in new hire training to ensure the new hire’s success.

And, unlike a capital expenditure, a talent investment will appreciate over time.

Empower your team to treat your people investments with the same diligence as capital investments and you’ll experience more success.