Archive for the ‘Leadership’ category

Update Job Accountabilities Regularly

September 30, 2012

Hopefully you have a job accountability matrix for each of your direct reports capturing the job’s activities, priorities, and success factors.  Maybe you have a “job description” instead listing the job’s requirements and expectations.  Maybe you have a tattered sheet of paper detailing what you’d like out of the job.

Whatever you are using to scope your direct report’s job, be sure to review and update it regularly.  We recommend reviewing job accountabilities during each quarterly performance review session.  By reviewing the accountabilities regularly with your direct report, you both are reminded of what is important.

Do not assume the job’s description is static and cannot be changed.  The document is a dynamic, evolving view of the job and should be updated as the job evolves or changes.  Your direct report should be responsible for “owning” this responsibility and keeping you apprised of changes.

Empower your direct reports to manage their job accountabilities and watch both your careers succeed.

A Little Attention Increases Productivity

September 23, 2012

In their book “Contented Cows Still Give Better Milk, The Plain Truth About Employee Engagement In Your Bottom Line,” Bill Catlette and Richard Hadden describe how animal science studies have shown that dairy cattle who are given a first name and are regularly called by that first name will produce an additional 60 gallons of milk annually. That’s amazing, simply paying attention to the producer increases their productivity.

How does that translate to your direct reports? Our experience has shown that leaders who conduct regular one-on-one meetings with their direct reports get much more productivity out of those direct reports.  Sometimes its hard to remember these one-on-one meetings need to be about what the employee needs, not focused on their boss.  Everyone needs the undivided attention of their boss and it is proven that those who get that attention are more productive.

Empower yourself to conduct regular one-on-ones with your direct reports, and you’ll all experience more success.

It’s What Bad Bosses Don’t Do That Makes Them Bad

September 12, 2012

When we think of bad bosses, images from the comic strip Dilbert and the television shows The Office and Mad Men come to mind.  We imagine bad bosses as those screaming, paper throwing, sexist leaders Hollywood likes to portray.  Since most leaders don’t demonstrate these behaviors, they don’t consider themselves bad bosses.

However, research suggests that the offensive actions associated with being a bad boss make up less than 20% of the behavior that actually defines the worst bosses.

When HBR authors Jack Zenger and Joseph Folkman analyzed the behavior of 30,000 managers, as seen through the eyes of their 300,000 peers, direct reports, and bosses on 360-degree evaluations, they found that the bad bosses were guilty more of what they didn’t do than what they did do.

Bad bosses didn’t:

  • give timely and productive feedback
  • spend consistent, quality one-on-one time with their direct reports
  • give quarterly performance reviews
  • clearly define job expectations
  • set goals aligned with the organization’s goals
  • develop their direct reports
  • create succession plans

Ask yourself what you can do to be a better boss and you’ll be more successful.

Take Time To Sharpen The Saw

August 31, 2012

Habit #7 in Steve Covey’s The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People is called “Sharpen the Saw.” Covey describes a woodcutter who is sawing for several days straight and is becoming less and less productive. Cutting dulls the blade and the solution is to sharpen the saw; however, the woodcutter is too busy cutting to take time out to sharpen his saw and is stuck in an unproductive cycle.

Many leaders believe taking time off or going on vacations sharpens the saw; this is putting the saw down not necessarily improving yourself.  Sharpening the saw requires an activity that is targeted at self improvement.  Here are some saw sharpening activities we’ve seen:

  • Embark on an extensive exercise program
  • Take a class (cooking, economics, leadership, etc)
  • Eat at least one healthy meal each day
  • Volunteer at church, Rotary, Lions or other industry committees
  • Meditate for ten minutes each day
  • Organize your work area
  • Read a literary classic

Let us know what have you done to sharpen your saw lately.  Empower yourself to take time for self improvement and you’ll be more successful cutting down your trees.

Weigh The Steps In Your Selection Process

August 27, 2012

The U.S. Department of Labor stipulates that if hiring managers administer assessments to candidates, the results of the assessments cannot represent more than 33% of the decision to hire or not hire.  That means at least 67% of a hiring manager’s decision to hire or not hire must consist of other screening activities.  What are the activities in your screening process and how are they weighted?

Below are the steps and percentages we suggest our clients follow in their selection process:

  1. Phone screen (salary and basic skills fit) – 5%
  2. Core values email (values and writing skills fit) – 10%
  3. First interview (skills, experience, culture fit) – 20%
  4. Assessment results (personal skills, behaviors, culture, critical thinking fit) – 20%
  5. Reference checks (screening concerns addressed) – 10%
  6. Follow-up interviews (screening and reference concerns addressed) – 20%
  7. Handle selection process (project management skills demonstrated) – 15%

While being in legal compliance is important, the reality is there is a strong business case to have multiple steps in a selection process.  No assessment is 100% accurate because humans are more complex than any one, two, or three assessments; however they are a great basis from which to create exploratory conversations — with the candidate AND references.  It’s equally important to see how a candidate does moving through a process and not just in each specific step in the process.

Empower your hiring managers to consider many aspects when hiring and you’ll make more successful hires.

The Real Answer Comes From The Third Or Fourth Answer To The Question

August 17, 2012

We’ve all seen the heroic detective in the movies interrogate the lying criminal with deep questioning eventually getting them to admit the truth.  Psychologists have long recognized most “normal” people cannot effectively and consistently make-up details about past events on the fly and eventually tell the truth (psychotics are capable of imagining and recounting untrue facts while believing them).

You should use a similar approach to your interview questioning.  When preparing to interview your candidates (yes, you do need to do some pre-work if you expect a productive interview), plan three or four follow up questions to the initial question.

For example, while probing a candidate’s personal accountability you might plan to ask, “Tell me about a time when it was necessary to admit to others that you had made a mistake.”  Next follow up with questions like:

  • “Who was involved in the situation?”
  • “What did your boss do afterwards?”
  • “How long was it before you admitted the mistake?”
  • “What subsequent mistakes have you made and how have you handled them?”

Answering a series of questions becomes harder with each question and you’ll likely gain greater insights into the candidate with the follow-up questions.

Empower your hiring managers to dig deeper in their questioning and you’ll make more successful hires.

It’s Not Too Late To Introduce Success Factors To Your Direct Reports

August 11, 2012

When you’re finished changing, you’re finished. – Benjamin Franklin

Patrick Lencioni in Three Signs Of A Miserable Job says, “A job is bound to be miserable if it doesn’t involve measurement.”  Yet most jobs do not have defined success factors.

Just because your direct reports have been doing their jobs without defined measures and successes, doesn’t mean you can’t start now.  Change is good, and improving the way you hold your direct reports accountable, is good.

To get started, let your direct reports know you are going to introduce a tool to assist you in helping them gain clarity on their job.  Work with your direct report and others connected to the job to determine the important job accountabilities and measures.  Finalize the document and meet with your direct reports to let them know this is going to be their “scorecard” and you’ll be reviewing each success factor with them at least monthly.  The first couple of meetings might seem a little awkward but as you both understand the expectations, you’ll quickly become comfortable with the process.

Empower your direct reports with defined success measurements and you’ll both be more successful.

Are Employees Really Your Greatest Asset?

August 3, 2012

Many, if not most organizations, promote their employees as being their “greatest asset.”  Unfortunately, most employees indicate they hardly feel like an asset, much less among the greatest assets of the company.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the average employee stays at a company for 3.5 years and makes about $40,000 per year.  Therefore the average “employee asset” costs organizations just in wages $140,000.  How much effort do you invest in your employee assets as compared to your investments in other $140,000 assets?  Think about how much time you spend buying and maintaining your computer systems – how does that compare to the time you spend hiring and accelerating the performance of your direct reports?  Ask yourself these questions:

  • Do you give your “greatest assets” daily, customized feedback?
  • Do you invest 30 minutes of uninterrupted one-on-one time weekly with your “greatest assets” talking about their issues?
  • Do you review your “greatest assets'” accomplishments, personal development, core value adherence, and future objectives at least quarterly?
  • Do your “greatest assets” have clear job accountabilities specifying key activities, time percentages, priorities, and success factors?
  • Do your “greatest assets” know what the organization’s goals are and do they have goals that are aligned to the organization’s?
  • Do your “greatest assets” continually work at developing to be a better person – physically, emotionally, intellectually, and spiritually?
  • Do you have a succession plan for your “greatest assets” so they don’t feel trapped in their role?

Remember, unlike most assets on your balance sheet, these assets should appreciate over time so the investment you make in them should continue to net you great returns.  Invest in your greatest assets regularly and empower them so you’ll all be successful.

Think Twice Before Promoting Your Best Producer

July 27, 2012

Do the best producers make the best managers? Almost unanimously, when leaders are asked this question, the answer is “no.” Yet too often leaders look for candidates among their best producers and select the best worker for the manager job. They assume that because an individual was successful in their contributor role, that individual will be successful in management, too.

Of course, many great producers can and do become great managers, but this is not always the case. Too often, when a superstar gets promoted to manager, one or more of the following happens:

  • He (or she) can’t let go of his old role. He takes charge of details, undermining direct report’s motivation and confidence and weakening their respect.
  • He manages by results only. He expects everyone to produce the same results that he got, but isn’t good at coaching and giving people constructive feedback on how to get there.
  • He avoids administrative responsibilities. He becomes frustrated by the many routine but important tasks that management requires of him.

Before long, the direct reports he manages stop learning and growing. They become disenchanted, disengage from their work, and may even leave the company.

Before promoting the superstar, treat them like you would any external managerial candidate and put them through your rigorous selection process (make sure they are comfortable with the manager job accountabilities, assess their leadership skills, and seek references from others who have seen them lead).  Superstar individual contributors are often happier and better serve the organization doing what they are doing.

Empower yourself to thoroughly vet a superstar before promoting them and you’ll both be more successful.

Remember Stephen Covey’s Habit #2 When Hiring

July 20, 2012

Stephen Covey’s sad passing reminds us of his popular “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People” that was published in 1989 and has sold more than 25 million copies in 38 languages.  This iconic inspirational book is as pertinent today as it was 23 years ago. Though Covey presented many lessons to apply to the selection process, the most important is Habit #2: Begin With The End In Mind.

All too often hiring managers get caught up in the details of the selection process and lose sight of why they are making the hire to begin with.  What’s important is finding a way to accomplish the success factors associated with a job.  If hiring someone achieves that objective, great.  If the success factors can be accomplished by some other means, that’s great too.

Don’t assume making the perfect hire is going to ultimately achieve success.  Start by defining what success in the job looks like and recruit, hire, on-board, and manage towards those goals.  A good hire alone without success defined will not necessarily achieve the objective.

Empower your hiring managers to “Begin With The End In Mind,” define success, and you’ll achieve the results you are looking for.